<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/</link>
	<description>following jesus in a post religious world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emerging mosaic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart?</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/comment-page-1/#comment-10540</link>
		<dc:creator>emerging mosaic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 05:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andredaley.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/#comment-10540</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart? [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart? [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Complex Christ: Neophilia [4] &#124; Unmask the Fantasy Self</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>The Complex Christ: Neophilia [4] &#124; Unmask the Fantasy Self</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andredaley.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] &#187; the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart? from emerging mosaic Is the emergent conversation coming apart and drifting into neophilia? Kester Brewin introduced theconceptof neophilia in a series of postson his blog Neophilia -being in love with newness for newness sake. Neoph... [Read More] [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] &raquo; the emerging church and neophilia- Is the emergent conversation coming apart? from emerging mosaic Is the emergent conversation coming apart and drifting into neophilia? Kester Brewin introduced theconceptof neophilia in a series of postson his blog Neophilia -being in love with newness for newness sake. Neoph&#8230; [Read More] [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My stupid mouth.</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>My stupid mouth.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andredaley.com/2006/02/26/the-emerging-church-and-neophilia-is-the-emergent-conversation-coming-apart/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;2) to Andre Daley, who&#039;s website is now one of my favs to read, mainly b/c he is the kind of critic that emergent really needs but hasn&#039;t had yet. Check out his comments on being &quot;post-emergent,&quot; on &quot;neophilia,&quot;, the slow-to-develop praxis of emergent,and the conversation&#039;s lack of diversity, among others. He also was how I found the Driscoll apology, which he linked.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->2) to Andre Daley, who&#8217;s website is now one of my favs to read, mainly b/c he is the kind of critic that emergent really needs but hasn&#8217;t had yet. Check out his comments on being &#8220;post-emergent,&#8221; on &#8220;neophilia,&#8221;, the slow-to-develop praxis of emergent,and the conversation&#8217;s lack of diversity, among others. He also was how I found the Driscoll apology, which he linked.<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
