<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emergent and large</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/</link>
	<description>following jesus in a post religious world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:27:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Daley</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/comment-page-1/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>DJ,
You are right and I have no problem with that. But I really have a problem with some of the emergent folks looking down their noses at mega churches and or suggesting that the de facto model of emerging church is small (in order to have &quot;real&quot; community) and flat leadership (avoiding charismatic leaders)

Just admit that many of the approaches being critiqued are also being practiced.

 

Andre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ,<br />
You are right and I have no problem with that. But I really have a problem with some of the emergent folks looking down their noses at mega churches and or suggesting that the de facto model of emerging church is small (in order to have &#8220;real&#8221; community) and flat leadership (avoiding charismatic leaders)</p>
<p>Just admit that many of the approaches being critiqued are also being practiced.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Andre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Daley</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/comment-page-1/#comment-4892</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Daley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/#comment-4892</guid>
		<description>Rich,

Pluralistic in expression yes! Diverse not so much. There still are not many churches or people of color acknowledged as emerging. Check out this post. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/08/12/is-mosaic-a-part-of-the-emerging-church/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is mosaic a part of the emerging church&lt;/a&gt;

Andre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>Pluralistic in expression yes! Diverse not so much. There still are not many churches or people of color acknowledged as emerging. Check out this post. <a href="http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/08/12/is-mosaic-a-part-of-the-emerging-church/" rel="nofollow">is mosaic a part of the emerging church</a></p>
<p>Andre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/comment-page-1/#comment-4887</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/#comment-4887</guid>
		<description>I think it just goes to show how diverse the EC really is. I&#039;m finding it diverse to the point that the label is passe now. There are other high profile EC&#039;s that are just as big or bigger. Of the bat I think of Imago Dei and Mosaic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it just goes to show how diverse the EC really is. I&#8217;m finding it diverse to the point that the label is passe now. There are other high profile EC&#8217;s that are just as big or bigger. Of the bat I think of Imago Dei and Mosaic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djchuang</title>
		<link>http://www.postreligiouschristian.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/comment-page-1/#comment-4885</link>
		<dc:creator>djchuang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingmosaic.com/2006/11/19/emergent-and-large/#comment-4885</guid>
		<description>The thing is, many of the emergent spokes-people are charismatic leaders with larger churches. The emergent churches that are small with lesser charismatic leaders don&#039;t get top billing at conferences or book contracts. As much as emergent deconstructs the system, it&#039;s really very hard to get around the attraction that human nature has for certain kinds of speakers and larger sized churches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, many of the emergent spokes-people are charismatic leaders with larger churches. The emergent churches that are small with lesser charismatic leaders don&#8217;t get top billing at conferences or book contracts. As much as emergent deconstructs the system, it&#8217;s really very hard to get around the attraction that human nature has for certain kinds of speakers and larger sized churches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
